Huh?? you are the one trying to stop discussion on this issue
I am discussing indisputable facts - that this is a MANUFACTURED document
if you cannot be convinced by facts then that is your problem and you should seek help
DC, for instance, is still CREATING a brand new printed document from the data base ~ you couldn't get a digital image out of it if you bribed the mayor. Folks have noted that the director of Hawaii's DOH had been saying that the short form document was drawn from a data base and printed.
Your attempt to demolish the legitimacy of the Obama LFBC without any consideration of what the normal practices of Hawaii DOH are is exactly the thing that serves the interests of the Obamistas.
You can have a gazillion little factoids that focus mostly on the quality of the print job but if you don't know how the entire system works over time, and how they did it 40 years ago, 30 years ago, 20 years ago and 10 years ago, and what major changes were made to the system, then you have no idea where such "factoids" might well arise out of the normal operation of the system.
You also have to account for the fact that a really high class forgery operation is going to attempt to recreate a document that is indistinguishable from contemporaneous documents.
There are SEVERAL LFBC from Hawaii whose creation begins 40 years ago and ends up as a recent printout within the last year.
They look REMARKABLY like the latest Obama document!
So far nothing you've contributed adds one jot or tittle to what we've already figured out about the Obama LFBC. But you have railed against the efforts of others to contrast and compare, and to determine what was the normal process affecting a data base with the Obama LFBC information over time.
That, my strange little friend on FR, is the way a professional troll works ~ we've met your kind before!