To: philman_36
No, you’re just wrong. part 1401 does refer specifically to persons born in the U.S.
78 posted on
04/07/2011 11:02:58 PM PDT by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Ramius
No, youre just wrong. part 1401 does refer specifically to persons born in the U.S.
Where did I say that it didn't?
All I said was..."And, once again, 1401 says nothing whatsoever about natural born citizenship."
If it does then showcase it. And explain how Congress overstepped it's Constitutional powers in the process.
82 posted on
04/07/2011 11:13:44 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Ramius
No, youre just wrong. part 1401 does refer specifically to persons born in the U.S.
This has been hashed out dozens of times here in the past. part 1401 refers to persons born in the U.S., but it makes no mention anywhere in the entire document about the term or meaning of the term “natural born citizen”. “Natural Born Citizen” as used in the Constitution of the United States was clearly refering to a person born within the boarders of the United States with two citizen parents. Don’t feel bad you are not the only one who remains confused on this issue. I challenge you to search for the term “natural born” anywhere in the “United States Code”. Then report back here with your findings.
115 posted on
04/08/2011 9:50:09 PM PDT by
fireman15
(Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson