Rush Limbaugh slammed for 'avoiding' eligibility

WorldNetDaily ^ | April 7, 2011 | Joe Kovacs

[fireman15]

So in your opinion... if Osmama bin Laden snuck into the country and impregnated the underage daughter of one of his sleeper cell followers... the founders of this country would have no objection to this child eventually becoming president with the financial support of his rich Saudi uncles.

I understand your definition of natural born, but I believe that it is a more recent distortion of the original definition. There is no evidence that I am aware of that the founding fathers would have supported your view.

[Windflier]

YOU don't even have to be correct at all considering you're not putting your reputation and credibility in front of millions of people on a daily basis.

Rush could have become as well-informed as any of us on this issue, over the last three years. The argument in favor of compelling Obama to reveal his true origins and alleged eligibility to hold office is airtight.

Rush was never in any danger of losing credibility over coming out on this issue. No, he failed the test that Donald Trump passed.

And, so what if he had stuck his neck out to at least ASK the right questions about this issue, prior to now? In the final analysis, standing up for this country is what it's all about. If he can't do that, then he's a coward and a poser, not fit to shine the boots of the Tea Party patriots.

It's absolutely irresponsible for a man to sit in a position of such influence and power, and remain mute while such an enormous travesty is being committed against his nation. A nation which he claims to love more than life itself.

Don't get me wrong - I love Rush, but in my estimation, he fell short of making the cut when it most counted. Same goes for all the rest of the talkers. History will show that they all failed us, when we needed them most.