Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: LorenC

That’s not an accurate reading. What was your reading comprehension score on your most recent standardized test? And how recent was it? Have you suffered some calamity affecting your intellect since?


370 posted on 01/27/2011 2:09:37 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]


To: bvw; curiosity
"That’s not an accurate reading"

OK, then what's the accurate reading? Here it is again:

"To be President one has to be a "native-born citizen" If Obama's Mama gave birth to him in another country then that would make him a "citizen at birth" but not a "native-born citizen" It's worth knowing since its Constitutional and would set precedent that the Libs would love."

Now you said of this comment that "The "natural born citizenship" meaning that BOTH parents are citizens was discussed as least as early as the 3rd of July 2008 on Free Republic."

Where in that July 2008 comment you quoted do you see socialismisinsidious say that natural born citizenship requires that BOTH parents must be citizens? Where do you see the implication that Obama, if born in Hawaii, could not be President because of his father's citizenship?

372 posted on 01/27/2011 2:16:00 PM PST by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]

To: bvw
Dog Gone -- also brings it up at 165:
Sure, there's been talk, but your understanding of the law is incorrect. You have to be a "natural born citizen" which can either be accomplished by place of birth or by the citizenship of your parents.

The place of your birth is not determinative if it's outside the US.


376 posted on 01/27/2011 2:18:31 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson