Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Kenny Bunk
To become President,however, the Constitution clearly states that one is required to be a Natural Born Citizen.

True, and the founders clearly understood that to mean a person who was born a citizen.

Therefore, there is a difference between a Natural Born Citizen and a Native Born Citizen,

No there isn't. The two terms are synonymous.

300 posted on 01/27/2011 12:43:13 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity

Then why is it differientiated in the Constutition?

You are SO fail.


319 posted on 01/27/2011 12:55:50 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais is beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity; Flamenco Lady; Danae; little jeremiah; Hotlanta Mike
I say: (1)Therefore, there is a difference between a Natural Born Citizen and a Native Born Citizen,
He says: No there isn't. The two terms are synonymous.

There you have the entire Natural Born Citizen argument.

Now enter the "Birthers," who rightly point out that Obama has not proven Hawaiian Birth. We cannot prove that he was foreign born. He cannot prove that he is Hawaiian born.

Which brings us back to the fundamental importance of Article II, and the question, "Can a dual citizen be a Natural Born Citizen?"

324 posted on 01/27/2011 1:07:02 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (America might survive Obama. It cannot survive those who vote for him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson