To: Kenny Bunk
To become President,however, the Constitution clearly states that one is required to be a Natural Born Citizen. True, and the founders clearly understood that to mean a person who was born a citizen.
Therefore, there is a difference between a Natural Born Citizen and a Native Born Citizen,
No there isn't. The two terms are synonymous.
To: curiosity
Then why is it differientiated in the Constutition?
You are SO fail.
319 posted on
01/27/2011 12:55:50 PM PST by
Danae
(Anailnathrach ortha bhais is beatha do cheal deanaimha)
To: curiosity; Flamenco Lady; Danae; little jeremiah; Hotlanta Mike
I say:
(1)Therefore, there is a difference between a Natural Born Citizen and a Native Born Citizen, He says:
No there isn't. The two terms are synonymous. There you have the entire Natural Born Citizen argument.
Now enter the "Birthers," who rightly point out that Obama has not proven Hawaiian Birth. We cannot prove that he was foreign born. He cannot prove that he is Hawaiian born.
Which brings us back to the fundamental importance of Article II, and the question, "Can a dual citizen be a Natural Born Citizen?"
324 posted on
01/27/2011 1:07:02 PM PST by
Kenny Bunk
(America might survive Obama. It cannot survive those who vote for him)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson