Re: ...the boy was named “for” Barack Obama of Kenya.
“Senior” spelled his name “Barak.”
http://cambodiana.org/MainreasonsofmysupportofObama.aspx
Cursor down to photos — “Reminiscenses”
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/img829.jpg
Problems Facing Our Socialism
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_eastafrica.html
Cursor down to “Authors”
Do you know how the BO campaign got America to believe the birth certificate image was for real, legally? ...Political advertising!
The ‘Fight the Smears’ web page with the image of a birth document is a political advertisement and conforms with U.S. Code 441.d, Publication and distribution of statements and solicitations. This code section deals with campaign funding, reporting and other parameters but does not require the material to be truthful by the person advertising. Political advertising is legal even if the advertiser does not tell the truth. In Edenfield v. Fane (91-1594), 507 U.S. 761 (1993), the Supreme Court said this in regard to the First Amendment right to freedom of speech and advertising;
“But the general rule is that the speaker and the audience, not the government, assess the value of the information presented.”
The campaign threw up an eye-catching wizardry of a political advertisement displaying graphics for visual impression, displaying statements of impression such as ‘native born’ and the candidate’s status as a ‘citizen by the 14th Amendment’ and solicitations of impressions to ‘donate now’ and tell others, all for the truth about the candidate.
The state of Hawaii has not ever stated that the online image was issued by them as the ‘issuing authority’ of a genuine ‘identification document’. The political ad by the campaign did not provide any further information verifying that the image came from the Hawaii Department of Health, Vital Records. The original online newspaper and fact checking organizations (L.A. Times, Daily Kos, Annenberg Political FactCheck, Politifact) who received the image from the campaign said they received the image from the campaign.
So therefore, the online image of the birth document means nothing...
...except that many many Americans were duped into believing the image was for real including our own state and national public officials!
http://jbjd.org/2011/01/03/de-coder-rings-1of2/
Everyone,
Let your state and national representatives and senators know this too!
