Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I am a believer in Male only universal, DADT at least, draft for 6 months or at most a year of intense basic infantry training only at 17 or 18 years of age, HS grad or no. No postings. It should perhaps not even be directly under DoD. No enlistment permitted for 6 months past graduation then no further requirement for service.

Being universal it would not be a disruption and no one would be "getting ahead" of his peers by going to school instead.

It would give us a population of young men who are all familiar with the military. Most of the resistance to the Draft was fear of the military as an unknown thing. With all familiar with it no combat or staffing draft would ever be necessary. A war situation would bring a flood of volunteers to serve just because the military is familiar to all young men, it is not a scary unknown and the training has given them character and confidence and instilled a sense of protecting family and country. The thing that undid the old Draft was its capriciousness and the opportunities for rich kids and politically connected kids to avoid it and stay cushily in universities. Make it a part of becoming an adult for boys.

12 posted on 01/07/2011 5:30:58 PM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus
What it would immediately be is a PC Indoctrination camp. No thanks. I'd rather see End Troop Srenghts to levels those serving now stop being over deployed and our military over extended. There aren't that many bases left set up for basic training thanks to Poppy and Clinton's base closures. No the military even for a few months is not for everyone either physically or mentally. I can think of a few I went to high school with back in the early 1970's that under no circumstances would I want to be in military training with them. Besides it would be Unconstitutional and against the very spirit our nation was founded on to make service to everyone mandatory. Isn't Obama pushing for just such a program or a simular one himself?

I support the Volunteer Military concept 100%. So did Reagan. When our economy went bad in the early 1980's he opened the doors for enlistemnts and let volunteers join. When our nation was attacked following 9/11 neither Congress nor GW Bush called for troop strength increases. We need to do right by the military we now have. That should be the current GOP congressional priority. We as a nation have not been doing such since 1989.

I have a total of 8 years and two services. 4/2 Navy and 1/1 Army NG. All was volunteer obligations. I've seen enough to know that what you are proposiing would among other things be a strain on our already depleted military resources.

I support re-instating no gays, no women serving in combat units or zones, nor especially being allowed to be on combat ships.

27 posted on 01/07/2011 9:02:44 PM PST by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson