Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

That link doesn’t carry any weight because its current law. What did the State Department say in 1968?

That is what’s relevant.


57 posted on 09/24/2010 1:37:41 PM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: conservativegramma

That link doesn’t carry any weight because its current law. What did the State Department say in 1968?

That is what’s relevant.


There has never been a time in US history when parents could renounce the US citizenship of minor children. The US Supreme Court’s decision in Perkins v Elg from 1939 is proof of that fact.
PERKINS V. ELG, 307 U. S. 325 (1939)
Case Preview

U.S. Supreme Court
Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)
No. 454
Argued February 3, 1939
Decided May 29, 1939*
307 U.S. 325
Syllabus

1. A child born here of alien parentage becomes a citizen of the United States. P. 307 U. S. 328.

2. As municipal law determines how citizenship may be acquired, the same person may possess a dual nationality. P. 307 U. S. 329.

3. A citizen by birth retains his United States citizenship unless deprived of it through the operation of a treaty or congressional enactment or by his voluntary action in conformity with applicable legal principles. P. 307 U. S. 329.

4. It has long been a recognized principle in this country that, if a child born here is taken during minority to the country of his parents’ origin, where his parents resume their former allegiance, he does not thereby lose his citizenship in the United States provided that, on attaining majority, he elects to retain that citizenship and to return to the United States to assume its duties. P. 307 U. S. 329.

Expatriation is the voluntary renunciation or abandonment of nationality and allegiance. P. 307 U. S. 334.

5. This right of election is consistent with the naturalization treaty with Sweden of 1869 and its accompanying protocol. P. 307 U. S. 335.

6. The Act of March 2, 1907, in providing “That any American citizen shall be deemed to have expatriated himself when he has been naturalized in any foreign state in conformity with its laws, . . . “ was aimed at voluntary expatriation, and was not intended to destroy the right of a native citizen, removed from this country during minority, to elect to retain the citizenship acquired by birth and to return here for that purpose, even though he may be deemed to have been naturalized under the foreign law by derivation from the citizenship of his parents before he came of age. P. 307 U. S. 342.
http://supreme.justia.com/us/307/325/


71 posted on 09/24/2010 2:18:11 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson