Replies

So, to recap the questions I posed:

"That Hawaii was the recipient of an exceedingly large number of Vietnamese immigrants?"

You've provided some limited figures about Hawaii's immigrant population in 1960. But nothing specific to Vietnam (which you cited as the source of the influx) and nothing to indicate that Hawaii's immigrant influx was particularly large compared to other immigrant-friendly states at the time, such as California or New York (as indicated by the data at the FAIR website). And I can't say I've ever heard of any supposed widespread birth certificate fraud committed by those states in the 1960s.

"That Hawaii's resources were taxed by the influx of immigration during the period?"

You've provided nothing to support this assertion of yours.

"That Hawaii was granting Certificates of Live Birth to "thousands" of babies based on nothing more than a witness signature?"

You've provided absolutely nothing to support this assertion of yours, and seem to be actively avoiding the subject.

"That Hawaii was giving out fraudulent birth certificates to lots and lots of foreign-born babies?"

And you've provided absolutely nothing to support this assertion of yours, and again seem to be actively avoiding responding to it.

On the other hand, you've inexplicably provided a lot of data about immigration to Hawaii during the 1990s, and the impact of recent immigration on Hawaii. In other words, data that is irrelevant by being 40-50 years too late.

Its up to you to disprove the theory.

Hogwash. You made up 'facts,' you got caught making up facts, and so you just want to shift the burden. Even if it *was* up to me, how would I possibly show that Hawaii *didn't* do something? That's proving a negative. If Hawaii actually *did* do that, you'd have a source for it. If thousands of foreign-born kids *did* get bogus Hawaiian birth certificates, you'd just point to the legitimate source where you learned that factoid.

But you don't, because you're just trading in made-up 'facts.' You make up stuff that sounds vaguely plausible, present it as factual, and then hope nobody questions it. And like usmcobra, when you get caught doing it, you just pass the buck and pretend like you have no responsibility to defend your own claims. Because if you don't make excuses, you'll have to admit that you have no real sources for half the stuff you're claiming.