RG you started the name call with Kent first, so why are you upset that he responds
You did not read the def at the link and you called him liberal. Why should he not respond to you with name calling and a semi-cute photo.
Marry me. ;)
I did read the definition, and yes, you are correct, I did call him a liberal.
He was certainly behaving like one.
But that was only after he called me an “online martyr”. That is what he does. He decides what your motives are, much like a liberal yelling racism.
Kent may or may not be a liberal, but he has proudly adopted their tactics.
Thus, if you have legit concerns about Palin, according to Kent and his ilk you are a Troll.
He called me a liar (quite rude) and most of what he does is post silly pictures around here. Intellectual debate is not his thing. He is a dismisser. Very arrogant.
Hope you can see where I am coming from.
Oh, and I have included Kent, so as not to talk behind his back.
FR is a site for grown ups, and I don’t think Kent is acting like one. Just my opinion.