So, in the end, you consider that the law (the constitution) cannot stand against a misinterpretation of the law? He got away with it - so the actual content and intent of the law matters naught? Your argument says that the fact that he was installed makes the foundation of the office moot - his qualifications don't matter, because someone said he was President.
I hope we have more of the rule of law in us than that, honestly.
You, too, have no right to demand obeisance to your opinion.
Unlike others, I am making no such demand. You, and all the others can freely reject my opinion. I'm not presenting it as fact, and I'm not suggesting that its the only one allowed.
If remedies other than impeachment are available to us at this point, I'd like to know what they are. I've heard some doozies: The D.C. police, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Federal Marshals, but I don't know of anything except impeachment that could stand Constitutional scrutiny. If you have any ideas, I'd like to hear them.