Why do you feel that analyzing the alleged COLB with a fine tooth comb is the wrong thing to do? Whatever paths lead directly or indirectly to the irrefutable facts would seem to be valid paths. What am I missing?
I wouldm’t think it was wrong if the premise was right. I have seen him take a legit scan and make the same charges against a long time freeper using his “expertise” and he was dead wrong.
I have other reasons for asking him to explain this, but I will wait on his explanation before I go into it any further.