In Palin's Legal Defense Fund Debacle, She Has Only Herself To Blame

FR | 6-25-10 | Bob J

[b9]

";^)

[Hoosier Catholic Momma]

Awesome :)

[McGruff]

[onyx]

:)

[safeasthebanks]

Get a life. Fast. (And I’m not really a Palin booster.)

[Oztrich Boy]

This reminds me of the Westboro Baptists obsession with gay people. They claim to oppose them, yet, there they are every time they think something gay happens. (and they think everything that happens is something gay)

Fixed it for you

[Lakeshark]

Which one is BJ and where is the institution he is posting from? Apologies to Liberty V for thiefing his pic, but it was too appropriate.........:-)

[Lakeshark]

Y'all have been well received here I see.

Nice vanity BJ, have you figured your way out of that paper bag yet?

Congrats on another job well done.....

:-)

[onyx]

LOL.

[Lakeshark]

I think BJ may have written his epitaph ......

Just when you think he can't write something dumber, he goes out and does it.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Perfect. ;)

[EveningStar]

Never jump into the middle of a bunch of frenzy feeding sharks Palinistas.

[rintense]

How you doing, McGinnis! And yes, you are a nutjob obsessed with Sarah Palin.

[Clyde5445]

Now you see why I call them the Rubber Room Crowd.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Actually, the court said she was following the advice of her lawyers, which was reasonable. They didn’t fault her in this.

Yeah but facts don't matter to Bob J, who probably developed carpal tunnel syndrome from typing his vanity.

[Jacob Kell]

Actually, the court said she was following the advice of some of her lawyers, which was understandable. They didn’t fault her in this. While the LDF was judged a violation of States ethics laws, it was on two weak technicalities-even Petumenos admitted that Governor Palin had acted in good faith throughout the process and on the advice of seven attorneys from three law firms who told her that the Trust WAS legal.

http://media.adn.com/smedia/2010/06/24/14/Palin%20report%202010-06.71097.source.prod_affiliate.7.pdf

[Bryan24]

First, your post must have merit.

After reading the articles yesterday, I've come to the conclusion that you simply don't like Palin at all and will use her hair color against her, if need be.

Palin has been the subject of the most intense political witchhunt that I have witnessed in 30 years of following politics. The only thing that comes close is the Clarence Thomas debacle.

Throughout all of this, the BEST that they could come up with was that the website was the "Official" and therefore MIGHT be confused with a state office.

HER HARDCORE OPPOSITION ADMITTED IN THE REPORT THAT PALIN ACTED IN GOOD FAITH THROUGHOUT AND NEVER HERSELF BROKE ANY ETHICS LAWS, AND THAT NO ETHICS LAWS WERE BROKEN!

What you are doing is taking the tiny little specks of microscopic dust and are making Mount Everest out of them.

Right now, Palin has a better ethical and personal conduct record that EVERY NATIONAL POLITICIAN OF BOTH PARTIES.

Object to her for legitimate concerns, something like her grasp of complex national economic issues. At least you would appear to be objective.

[Bryan24]

“She is only reimbursing up to the point of her resignation and has already set up a new LDF. “

Since you can’t resist trying to make her look guilty of something, try this - “She did not spend a penny of the funds in question and is re-imbursing all of that money to the donors so that NO QUESTION will remain about her motives.”

It’s called going the extra mile to insure integrity.

[ThomasSawyer]

Gee, for a woman who is so inexperienced and doesn’t have a snowball’s chance at the presidency, you anti-Palin folks sure are doing your darnedest to destroy her. I think ur all skeeeeeeeeeerd.

[Chunga]

Bob, you’re deteriorating. You can no longer spell or punctuate. Get help.