There has been no corroborative evidence that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro was born anywhere in the United States much less the State of Hawaii.
The absence of any collaborating evidence means there is nothing to establish any conclusive facts about the background of Barack Hussein Obama, that includes his birth location. The only thing that is claimed is ‘native’ status and that is based on his claims that he was born in Hawaii. Claimed but never proven. The same birth mother [if Stanley Ann] would produce two different outcomes if born in Hawaii or born in Kenya. But even the birth in Hawaii, there is questionable jurisdiction as stated [the law] under Title 8 and the 14th Amendment, complete jurisdiction, not a part thereof. If in Kenya, an underage mother that can not confir any US citizenship.
As stated, if Barack Hussein Obama could, beyond any doubt, establish that he was in fact born anywhere in the United States, that documentation would have been issued and paraded around long ago. The fact that expenses countinue to mount in opposition of releasing any dcouments speaks volumes in itself.
The Birth Certifcate is a smoke screen.
Condider what ‘IS’ on a long form and then ask yourself what could be there that would necessitate that records be hidden and unavailable.
We conclude based on Obama’s admission that he biological father is Barack Obama Sr, backed up by the divorce papers.
A foreigner, a British Subject who bestowed the same governance to his children, including Barack Hussein Obama.
There is no collaborative evidence that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro was born anywhere in the United States, including Hawaii. Because as stated ‘IF’ being born in the United States was all that was required to be eligible, then all the documents would have been released long ago.
The only other item of substantial importance is the biological mother. Again, with one admitted foreign parent, the question of citizenship is one of dual nationality. But with a foreign mother as I suspected long ago, that would mean that he has no legal United States citizenship of any kind. That in of itself would require all records that show his true birth to be hidden. The State of Hawaii has stated that his vital record was amended and this resulted in the multiple records they maintain on file.
All the other data on the long form does not matter, the number of siblings, weight, doctor, witnesses, et.
The doctor story was debunked long ago as a fabrication.
So again, the data that they are hiding is the actual birth mother, and even when Barack found this out, when he ‘discovered’ his birth certificate in the shoe box, he began the short road of hating his ‘adoptive’ mother’s race.
When Obama stated that he was a few months old when the Bay of Pigs happened, he was telling the truth, but combining the real facts with the fairy tale past in his autobiographies.
I doubt that Stanley Ann was pregnant at all, or even went to Africa at anytime, but that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya as the Kenyan government has stated numerous times. That his home country is Kenya as stated by his wife, Michelle.
That is the reason, why over $1.8 million has been spent to hide the simple fact that Barack Hussein Obama has no United States citizen parents. None.
Furthermore, two birth announcements for him appeared in both major Honolulu newspapers on Sunday August 13, 1961 and Monday, August 14, 1961.
All of that is corroborative to the degree that no court in 69 tries has invalidated that data including seven lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility that have been rejected by the US Supreme Court.
http://www.hi5deposit.com/health/vital-records/obama.html
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”—July 27, 2009
“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by [the Supreme Court of the United States in their 1898 decision in the case of U.S. v.] Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States natural-born citizens.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, “Ankeny et. al. v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels,” Nov. 12, 2009
“This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Constitution. See U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”—Chief US District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth in dismissing the Quo Warranto claim in “Taitz v Obama”—April 14, 2010
If anyone really wants to see Obama’s birth records, they can be subpoenaed for a Grand Jury investigation in accordance with Hawaii law. It is telling that no prosecuting attorney in the nation has convened a Grand Jury to look into this matter and gotten a judge to issue a subpoena for Obama’s long form, vault copy, original birth certificate.
Bullcrap response.
As for the newspaper announcements, they mean nothing. They are not legal documents, as even Chrissy Matthews admitted.
WKA parents were not US Citizens and WKA was deemed a citizen, not a ‘Natural Born citizen’
No case has been heard on the merits. The Lakin case a military officer charged with the UCMJ can not be dismissed. It only takes one case, and theat case is coming. The Apuzzo/Kerchner case is another.
Here is some more to weep over.
I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen -Rep. John Bingham, framer of the 14th Amendment, before The US House of Representatives ((Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291, March 9, 1866 ) http://grou.ps/zapem/blogs/3787
All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England.
-Circuit Justice Swayne, in United States vs Rhodes (1866)
http://www.thecommentary.net/1861-circuit-justice-swayne-defines-na…;
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
-Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett (1875)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_Z…;
“In Minor v. Happersett, Chief Justice Waite, when construing, in behalf of the court, the very provision of the fourteenth amendment now in question, said: ‘The constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that.’ And he proceeded to resort to the common law as an aid in the construction of this provision.”
-Justice Grey, in US v Wong Kim Ark (1898) http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=1…;
“My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen,” Chertoff replied.
“That is mine, too,” said Leahy
-Homeland Security SecretaryMichael Chertoff and Senator Patrick Leahy, (April 03, 2008) http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States. -110th Congress, SR 511 http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sr511/text