I was merely correcting one of your patently false statements (that "once a state has been allowed to join then the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over all cases in where a state may be a party").
Are you trying to suggest that the Texas v White decision is illegitimate because of the 11th Amendment? Well that's plain ridiculous.
A 'straw man argument,' but that's in keeping with your demonstrated preference for logical fallacies, including endless non sequiturs.
Or are you just wanting to say "Gotcha!!!" If so then go right ahead and enjoy your moment of 'triumph'. I don't imagine you have all that many.
Gosh, Non-Sequitur - most mature adults would not have had a problem with simply correcting their original misstatement (see your Post #298). The fact that you are criticizing me, almost 200 posts later, when it was your error (not mine) suggests that you are anything but a 'mature adult'...
;>)