[Non-Sequitur]

I notice you still have not addressed the Eleventh Amendment - and your apparent complete lack of knowledge thereof

You mean your imaginative interpretation thereof, don't you?

[Who is John Galt?]

WIJG: I notice you still have not addressed the Eleventh Amendment - and your apparent complete lack of knowledge thereof...

N-S: You mean your imaginative interpretation thereof, don't you?

Actually, I was referring to your Post #298 claim that "once a state has been allowed to join then the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over all cases in where a state may be a party." That is quite obviously not the case, given the specific written language of the Eleventh Amendment. And I found it rather amazing that you had never stumbled across that particular amendment in the course of your 'activities.'

No "imaginative interpretation" was required on my part - just the simple recognition that (once again) you don't know what you're talking about...

;>)