Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus
You will now rush to defend both Roe and Dred Scott for our amusement -- just to be consistent.

I will recognize them as valid Supreme Court decisions, which I disagree with. But as much as I may disagree with the court's decision that doesn't make abortion illegal just because I proclaim the decision bogus. Likewise you can howl and rage all you want about Texas v. White and claim it's bogus until you're blue in the face. That doesn't change the fact that unilateral secession as practiced by the Southern states is illegal and will remain illegal until the Constitution is amended or a future court overturns the decision.

As for Scott v. Sandford, defending that one is a Southern thang.

609 posted on 04/20/2010 1:12:09 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Bookmark for later.
726 posted on 04/21/2010 12:32:26 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson