Bless you!! Thanks! Please ping me when you get it uploaded.
Here it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7qEH-tKoXA
It is still processing, so give it a little time.
Here is my take on this:
The exchange starts out with Serrano more or less apologizing to Thomas for the left’s treatment of him in the past.
As Thomas is replying, Serrano then interrupts Thomas with an acknowledgment of a Thomas opinion (apparently stated previously) that he doesn’t think that the appropriations committee should necessarily be chaired by a judge.
Thomas then replies by relating that issue to the POTUS eligibility issue, indirectly referring to where Serrano was born.
Serrano then makes light of the apparent fact that SCOTUS (or Thomas) refuses to share opinion on the POTUS eligibility issue, but is willing to acknowledge his own eligibility to chair the committee.
Thomas then acknowledges the avoidance of the issue, but is not too clear on which... I believe in Thomas’ jest, he meant both.
What is clear to me is that Thomas is the one who brought the POTUS eligibility issue up.
My personal belief is that he did so because it is the eligibility issue which is first and foremost in his mind...
but he knows that politically, he must bide his time.
Thomas just couldn’t help himself. I think it frustrates him that the eligibility issue is not more prominent in the dominant media and court of public opinion.
Another clear conclusion I can draw from this is that EVERYBODY KNOWS ABOUT IT!!!
pay particular attention (freeze frame) at :57 - :61.
It is very hard to catch, but the facial expression on Thomas Changes immediately after his initial reference to birthplace, and he follows his statement with a very short exhale of breath as if he were saying or thinking that it’s hard to believe that what he just said was popular thought.