[Canedawg]

their REFUSAL to hear these cases angers and frustrates people who want our constitution protected and that alone will lead to a civil war on the OTHER SIDE of the spectrum. Do they not see this?

Imo they have been betting on a couple of things:

-the BC controversy arose before the election, and the rumblings of civil unrest worked back then, and didn't affect the election of the usurper. Since the tactic worked in 2008, they continue to hold that card;

-the thugs in Philly were an extension of the threats that Acorn/SEIU/Black Panthers would get violent if his eligibility was challenged. Black panthers brandished clubs outside voting areas, and the lack of prosecution affirmed that the thug tactics would go unpunished;

-they are betting that "bitter clingers" will cling to but not fire their weapons;

-the Marxofascists have been trying to provoke TEA partiers into doing something stupid so that martial law can be imposed. They don't avoid provocation, they engage in it;

-If there is a CW in the cards, there will be a great deal of posturing and maneuvering to get the other side to fire first. The significance of that is self-evident.

Thus, The Court continues to "evade" the issue.

[penelopesire]

We should find a foreign born conservative to try and get on the presidential ticket in 2012 and then just sit back and watch the fireworks....LOL!

I wonder if Mark Steyn would be interested? Perhaps Mr. Hanan from Britian? It would only be done in a few key states to smoke out the constitutional hypocrites...lol. Then..if the Obots howled..this candidate would have standing to insist on seeing Obama’s BC. /half joking