Your stance allows any scammer to make any claim they want and get away with it .If someone makes a claim no matter how outlandish do not ask them to verify it.
..Good luck making your way in the world
If he were to respond to you, IF he had the answers to the questions you raise, AND sent them to your private e-mail address, would that satisfy you? Or, would you HAVE to tell the world??
Do you think that YOUR opinion will sway the facts, one way or the other? Look what happened with Mike Taerg aka Little Kim...no proof is good enough, ever. Read the last part of this thread. Lucas Smith has his stalkers, they will hound him regardless of time span, regardless of location.
It is now an established fact that he has submitted the documents into the judicial system, as well as affidavits affirming how, when, where, and what he submitted to the courts. It’s done.
Do you think for one minute that this is only read by supporters? Do you think for one minute that anything he says is dissected and judged by those who do and do not want to believe its legimiticy?
Finally, can you concieve how much time and effort, for no money (you gotta pay bills and live)that it takes for him, or anyone to provide exhausting detail to people that will have no relevance to the actual acceptance of this document in the judical system. It will be investigated by them. Public pressure, so far, in this issue, or Obama qualifications, has been ignored.
So what is your point “woofie”, why do you want this information, IF it is detremental to authentication of this document. To what ends must he go to satisfy you?
IMO, you want what you want, when you want it, because you want it. Period. You can do nothing with the information. We all already know you do not believe him, I do not personally believe that anything he says will convince you.
If I were him, I would ask myself, what is the motovation based on what you have already said about him and his claims. Just another cyber stalker, not even questioning the focus of the thread, rather their own agenda. I would ignore you myself...he may not.
I raised the issue, and you made snide remarks to me, accused him of being a scammer, base on your own conclusions, ignoring the fact that his evidence is in the courts hands, not heresay. I simply pointed out the obvious...You don’t like it if someone disagrees with you, now do you....
I think you need a time out....FDLMAO