Replies

Judge Carter specifically stated that merely placing an authenticated Kenyan BC into evidence, presumably even with testimony from the hospital administrators, it would not be enough to overcome a certified BC from a state in the US in his court. HI says Obama was born there. Kenya might say Obama was born there. Judge Carter says he, as a US judge, would side with HI absent a reason to question the HI COLB.

So, why wouldn't' the mere fact that an authenticated KBC bring in enough reason to question a HI COLB? If that is pushed, Carter risks an international incident as it is a slap at Kenya.

What about taking this to a Kenyan court and having them declare it's authenticity? Of course that would prove their favorite son is a criminal but it would demand some action and might bring standing in a US court.

"So, why wouldn't' the mere fact that an authenticated KBC bring in enough reason to question a HI COLB? If that is pushed, Carter risks an international incident as it is a slap at Kenya."

My suspicion is that corrupt Kenya would be backing Judge Carter's ruling because they have much to gain by concealing Obama's birth and then blackmailing him for all they can get.

I'm not a lawyer, but I am hoping that Judge Carter could be reversed on his ruling which precluded discovery of Obama's original HI vital records or even submission of a certified HI COLB (not the Factcheck COLB that has never been submitted to a court).

Ultimately, I believe it may be the Court of Public Opinion which will look at the mounting evidence that Obama lies continuously ("You can keep your plan") did not write Dreams and is totally incompetent and over his head and Obama will lose his left-wing media protection.

A quo warranto could also put the burden of proof on Obama to show his qualifications and bring the public behind releases of the HI vital records.