Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: ASA Vet
How does having two citizen parents satisfy the Jus Soli requirement?

That is one aspect of this that I am not clear on.

I recall a Senate Resolution that stated children of Military who were born overseas were NBC, then later it was changed to all citizens, again, as long as both parents were citizens.

For example, if you and your wife were on vacation out of the country and she gave birth, or what if the birth occurred on an air plane in the middle of the Atlantic, or anywhere outside of US air space.

Like I said, I'm not clear on this aspect of it.

Do you know any sources I could go to to clear it up?

58 posted on 03/01/2010 6:42:04 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Las Vegas Ron
Do you know any sources I could go to to clear it up?

http://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/a-congressional-natural-born-citizen-parts-i-ii-iii/

164 posted on 03/01/2010 10:52:50 AM PST by patlin (1st SCOTUS of USA: "Human life, from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Ron
It's pretty much all covered in Vattel's law of nations. He of course does not cover birth in airplanes, but he does cover ships, both at sea and in territorial waters.

For example, if you and your wife were on vacation out of the country and she gave birth, or what if the birth occurred on an air plane in the middle of the Atlantic, or anywhere outside of US air space.

§ 215. Children of citizens born in a foreign country.

It is asked whether the children born of citizens in a foreign country are citizens? The laws have decided this question in several countries, and their regulations must be followed.(59) By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers, and enter into all their rights (§ 212); the place of birth produces no change in this particular, and cannot, of itself, furnish any reason for taking from a child what nature has given him; I say "of itself," for, civil or political laws may, for particular reasons, ordain otherwise. But I suppose that the father has not entirely quitted his country in order to settle elsewhere. If he has fixed his abode in a foreign country, he is become a member of another society, at least as a perpetual inhabitant; and his children will be members of it also.

§ 216. Children born at sea.

As to children born at sea, if they are born in those parts of it that are possessed by their nation, they are born in the country: if it is on the open sea, there is no reason to make a distinction between them and those who are born in the country; for, naturally, it is our extraction, not the place of our birth, that gives us rights: and if the children are born in a vessel belonging to the nation, they may be reputed born in its territories; for, it is natural to consider the vessels of a nation as parts of its territory, especially when they sail upon a free sea, since the state retains its jurisdiction over those vessels. And as, according to the commonly received custom, this jurisdiction is preserved over the vessels, even in parts of the sea subject to a foreign dominion, all the children born in the vessels of a nation are considered as born in its territory. For the same reason, those born in a foreign vessel are reputed born in a foreign country, unless their birth took place in a port belonging to their own nation; for, the port is more particularly a part of the territory; and the mother, though at that moment on board a foreign vessel, is not on that account out of the country. I suppose that she and her husband have not quitted their native country to settle elsewhere.

§ 217. Children born in the armies of the state.

For the same reasons also, children born out of the country, in the armies of the state, or in the house of its minister at a foreign court, are reputed born in the country; for a citizen who is absent with his family, on the service of the state, but still dependent on it, and subject to its jurisdiction, cannot be considered as having quitted its territory.

353 posted on 03/01/2010 11:33:46 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson