These posters vouch for Bam’s birth (for which there is no legal proof), then claim that they don’t support him. Clueless.
If there is one good thing that has come out of all of this, it is the evidence that Chester A. Arthur was a fraud, and therefore is unuseable by Team Obama as some sort of precedent.
But you are too harsh on those who may vouch for Obama's alleged Hawaiian Birth. I am NOT among them, but I can see why they might. After all, a duly appointed AG, serving under an elected Republican Governor, has given his authorization to a state agency, The Hawaiian Department of Health, to declare Obama (of all things) "a Natural Born Citizen."
Not only that, but that same Republican AG has supported those state officials who have absolutely stonewalled requests, made according to Hawaiian law, to release any documentation that may have led them to make that extraordinary statement. BTW, the governor and the AG have the legal authority to order release of those documents themselves, without hiding behind (of all things) The Department of Health.
Many people have a tendency to believe what they are told by goverment officials. I sincerely hope that naïveté is the real reason these posters support the Hawaiian Birth story without any legal proof.