> The only persons who arent subject to the jurisdiction > thereof are those with diplomatic immunity. Oh, really?! Let's dispel that little After-Birther myth right now!
“Indians ... although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, within the meaning of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, than the children ... born within the United States of ambassadors or other public ministers of foreign nations.” Elk v. Wilkins (1884) See FRANCIS PAUL PRUCHA, AMERICAN INDIAN POLICY IN CRISIS 343-44 (University of Oklahoma Press 1964) on the 14th Amendments non-application to Indian people. Also, an 1870 Senate report concluded that the 14th Amendment did not extend to Indian people, for they were not within the jurisdiction of the United States as the Amendment required. This non-inclusion of the American Indians was adjusted for by a Congressional action the 1924 Citizenship ACT. Yeah, sorry After-Birthers! Congress just must KNOW something you don't (or at least what you After-Birthers just choose to ignore) ... AND ... while we're on the topic of subject to the jurisdiction thereof, let's look at a more MODERN piece of BIPARTISAN Legislation written to "redefine" subject to the jurisdiction thereof to adjust the "Natural Born Citizen" Eligibility requirement for the office of the President:
To define the term `natural born Citizen' as used in the Constitution of the United States to establish eligibility for the Office of President.
|
Uh, yeah, many Indian tribes were very clearly not under the jurisdiciton of the United States in the 1800s. We made treaties with them for a reason.
As you well know, Congress does not control definition of the Constitutional provisions.