Only the founders could be ‘just’ citizens. But Chester Arthur’s father was from the UK and that didn’t disqualify him.
Think about this: if England decided to make Sarah Palin a British citizen, would that disqualify her?
You might want to check history as they tried to disqualify him. Just before his death, he burned all of his papers.
Chester A. Arthur’s eligibility
IT WAS FIRST DISCOVERED ON DEC. 6, 2008 THAT PRESIDENT CHESTER ARTHUR - DUE TO HIS FATHER HAVING NOT NATURALIZED UNTIL 1843 - WAS BORN A BRITISH SUBJECT IN 1829 AND THAT HE ACTIVELY CONCEALED THIS FACT FROM HISTORY BY MULTIPLE LIES CONCERNING HIS FATHER'S EMIGRATION, AGE, AND RESIDENCE IN CANADA.
it does not appear that the United States has ever had a President who wasn't born in the United States to parents who were both United States citizens. There have been Presidents who had one parent born abroad, but as far as Applicant has been able to verify, in each of those cases, the alien parent had become a Citizen prior to giving birth to their child who later became President."
Why are you on Bam's side? Why are you arguing to prove he's legitimate? What proof do you have other than what he's told you? Has a court verified his Colb?
It's my understand he spend a great deal of time destroying personal papers. One has to wonder how well known his supposed dual citizenship was.
It doesn't matter anyway. An unconstitutional act in the past cannot set a precedent to give legitimacy to the current dilemma.
Obama MAY be a native born citizen, but he is NOT a natural born one.
If you want to understand the Arthur cover-up, just click & listen:
No, but the real criteria is not "no dual citizens", it's "two citizen parents". Thus it does not really matter if the "other" parent's country claims the child as a citizen/subject or not.