Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip

That’s not suprising. A person was being held as a slave as late as 1902 when the 13th Amendment had been ratified in 1865 because they “didn’t get the memo.”
Was that slave being held in the halls of Congress because that is where the testimony from the Census was being given in post #264.

The law often moves slowly.

So do some minds.


No, it was not in Congress. If I remember correctly, the last known slave was being held in Iowa which was not even a slave state. His owner simply did not tell slaves about the Emancipation Proclamation.

Yes, I agree with you that some minds do indeed move slowly.


409 posted on 03/02/2010 11:31:53 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]


To: jamese777
Was that slave being held in the halls of Congress because that is where the testimony from the Census was being given in post #264 .... No, it was not in Congress. If I remember correctly, the last known slave was being held in Iowa which was not even a slave state. His owner simply did not tell slaves about the Emancipation Proclamation. Yes, I agree with you that some minds do indeed move slowly.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh -- never mind.

414 posted on 03/02/2010 12:11:37 PM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson