To: Man50D
How does that “prove” anything?
To: ilovesarah2012
How does that prove anything?
The passage from the nomination documents I cited in my previous post to you shows the DNC recognized there are Constitutional requirements that must be met for a person to qualify as President. That should have been obvious to you given the specific reference to the Constitution.
That passage also points out the fact it is not incumbent upon people to prove a person is eligible to be President but instead is incumbent on the individual to prove he or she meets the Constitutional requirements in Article 2 Section 1.
470 posted on
02/24/2010 8:30:52 AM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: ilovesarah2012
Your comments are really feeble. If you’re getting paid, and not just a volunteer, you need much better talking points. Ask your supervisor for a better list.
488 posted on
02/24/2010 9:32:17 AM PST by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson