Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Man50D

How does that “prove” anything?


430 posted on 02/24/2010 5:17:21 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: ilovesarah2012
How does that “prove” anything?

The passage from the nomination documents I cited in my previous post to you shows the DNC recognized there are Constitutional requirements that must be met for a person to qualify as President. That should have been obvious to you given the specific reference to the Constitution.

That passage also points out the fact it is not incumbent upon people to prove a person is eligible to be President but instead is incumbent on the individual to prove he or she meets the Constitutional requirements in Article 2 Section 1.
470 posted on 02/24/2010 8:30:52 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

Your comments are really feeble. If you’re getting paid, and not just a volunteer, you need much better talking points. Ask your supervisor for a better list.


488 posted on 02/24/2010 9:32:17 AM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson