[mkjessup]

I didn't see any mention of McLame in there, yet here you are with the same current defeatism. Nobody has elected you to anything, have they? I seem to think she has a little more experience, and much better credentials.

We The People do not NEED to be elected to anything, WVK.

What is your purpose for showing up on all these Sarah threads, with the sole intent of breeding YOUR discontent?

This thread was posted in 'News/Activism', meaning anyone is free to post to it, perhaps it should have been posted in 'Religion' so the object of your ardent admiration and affection can be properly shielded from the likes of us rogue Freepers?!?

So are you running for office or not WVK? Let me know in time for me to re-register down in Ronceverte, ok?

[stephenjohnbanker]

“This thread was posted in ‘News/Activism’, meaning anyone is free to post to it, perhaps it should have been posted in ‘Religion’ so the object of your ardent admiration and affection can be properly shielded from the likes of us rogue Freepers?!?”

I think that religion would be more appropriate.

[WVKayaker]

So are you running for office or not WVK?

The decision will be made after the first of the year, but I am leaning that way. I see nobody challenged the incumbent D in the last election. He got 90+% of the votes. I will be running for WV-1, if I commit. I don't beleive Greenbrier Co. is in WV-1.

You certainly don't need to be elected to anything, but you're sure politicking awful hard for somebody. There is no other reason for the constant Sarah-bashing. Are you that afraid that she may get elected and not perform to your specifications. I can guarantee that fact. Nobody will do that for you, or me, either. It's called give-and-take. Yes, it's called "expediency", too.

It isn't bashing to raise legitimate questions...

For me, my constant endorsement is not worship, FRiend. It is admiration and respect. I think she is a remarkable person with a chance to make a difference in our country. We are in the biggest battle of the Republic, for more than just a single principle. Conservative purity would be certainly central to our hearts, but the most important criteria at this point in history, is who can beat the black guy raping and pillaging our children's future? I see nobody else, but you obviously disagree.

It's possible you just like negatives, instead of positives. Negativity's the best tool in the world. What you're doing is trying to "swiftboat" her, or use a "push poll" tactic. Whatever the reason, it's because she is an obvious target. She's winning and everybody's talking about her. EVERYBODY. The problem is she can actually see Russia from part of Alaska, and we all get to make up our own minds!

I don't have access to her mind, so I can't comment on her actions toward McLame and the other RINOS. I would like to get rid of them, too. But, I don't get everything I want, either. I have (and will) sent money to SarahPac.

I've got a great idea. Why don't you start a political party and promote your own ideal. The Republican Party will never meet your expectations, it appears from reading your posts. You can even post threads on FR and we will all come to pick out the things we don't like about him/her and dump all the crap we can editorialize about, without care for what it does to the future of America. That is the impression I am getting most from your tactics.

BTW, did you know that Sarah has more than 1,115,901 supporters on FaceBook now?

click for SarahPAC