Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: oldtimer2
Victoria's Secret was promoting 7 panties for $21--how much profit can VS rake in selling 7 panties for $21?--

$3.00 for apiece for panties?  Heck you can get a house for that around here in MI.

Thank you unions, and incompetent management.  Can only blame Granholm so much...
3 posted on 11/16/2009 9:55:07 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: quantim
*** $3.00 for apiece for panties? Heck you can get a house for that around here in MI. ***

They cannot give them away in Detroit for 3 dollars. I recently read about one for a buck that had no takers....

8 posted on 11/16/2009 10:10:56 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

“Victoria’s Secret was promoting 7 panties for $21—how much profit can VS rake in selling 7 panties for $21?—”

Well, 3 stings do not cost that much....


13 posted on 11/16/2009 10:25:44 PM PST by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson