And continue to. Judge Land in Georgia denied the TRO and dismissed the Rhodes case.
From this judge’s written opinion it is obvious that he is hostile toward the very suggestion that BHO might not be NBC, and never intended to let any “birther” case proceed.
After conducting a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s claims are frivolous.
While many others here are very critical of you, I do think you raise reasonable issues on many occasions. That said, it is all too common for judges who don't want to deal with the legal issues to simply say they are frivolous when there is actual merit.
I do not think the use of military plaintiffs in an attempt to prove Obama's ineligibility is the proper route to take. I think the California case is a much better one for this purpose; and I think it has a reasonable chance of success, especially now that Kreep is representing some of the plaintiffs.
I doubt the Rule 11 sanctions and imposition of costs would hold up on appeal since to support those sacntions, the court would pretty much have to prove the allegations were false, which is impossible to do without producing the actual long for birth certificate.
Still not one single hearing on the single contested fact: Obama is ineligible. The “Judge” punted.
And it appears Smith and Orly have parted ways.
I haven't read the updates this morning (can't access YouTube from work).
Major smackdown, that.
This is a *BUMP* in the road. I’m not *SURPRISED* a Clinton hack would rule as Land did. In the end *JUSTICE* will *PREVAIL*.
Thanks for the heads up. I continue to be patient.
It’s not over, till it’s over....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2341152/posts