...given the defendents time to prove why the captain does not have Standing in the MTD, which he stated in court, in front of witnesses, but not in court documents, that the MTD was not likely to be upheld...
Here is a Transcript of last weeks hearing. Judge Carter said no such thing.
...given the defendents time to prove why the captain does not have Standing in the MTD, which he stated in court, in front of witnesses, but not in court documents, that the MTD was not likely to be upheld...
Here is a Transcript of last weeks hearing. Judge Carter said no such thing.
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2009/090909/FrntPgObamaEligibility.html
This and about 40 other published reports by different people who were in the court say he did say so, and like I said before, you and I had this discussion before and I proved it then.
Berg and Donfrio had their cases set aside because of lack of standing, neither have filed in federal court this year.
But they did file. And their cases were brought to a conclusion. To date all that Orly has managed to do is file, spend 9 months serving the defense, and make it through two hearings. She has not made it past the motion to dismiss as yet. If she does that then you can crow about her. Until then she’s just in the prelims, and not doing a bang up job so far.
My statement that they did not file this year is Correct, they did not have conclusions as they were set aside for lack of standing. They can be redone if standing is established. So far they have done nothing but denigrate Orly Taits, who IS doing something, Just like you. If you want the truth, I question why you malign someone who is going after it????
You are aware, are you not, that the defense submitted a motion to curtail discovery last Thursday? And that they are under no obligation to cooperate with Tatitz until the judge rules on their motion? Gary Kreep filed his response to that motion this morning. I doubt that Orly is aware that the motion was even filed.
Yes, I am aware that they filed, you are aware of Orly Taits response as well?
In response US attorneys representing the defendants have filed a motion to stay the discovery, meaning to stop it. The fact that they filed it, doesn’t mean anything. It doesn’t mean thet judge Carter will grant it, that he will say yes. As a matter of fact time and again in court, on the record judge Carter stated that he believes that this case needs to be heard in open court on the merits, that it should not be dismissed on technicality, that there is jurisdiction. So, they can ask to behead me, too and I am sure Obama and his sidekick Eric Holder will love it, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that judge Carter is going to say: Yes guys, go for it.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
Gary Kreep filed his response to that motion this morning. I doubt that Orly is aware that the motion was even filed.
Here is the link N-S:
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/09/15/keyesbarnett-v-obama-doc-64-keyes-v-obama-64-opposition-to-application-for-limited-stay-of-discovery/
I am quite sure that this news is well known to her. Can you prove that it is not known to her?
She later received her law degree from Taft Law School in Santa Ana, California, and subsequently passed the California bar exam., argueably the toughest of bar exams.
There are those who say that the reason why California’s failure rate is so high is because they allow graduates of law schools like Taft to sit for it.
The lawyers I have spoken to, state emphatically that passing the Bar in California is very, very, tough, and you have to know your stuff to pass.
Passing the California bar exam is one of the highest professional achievements because it is such a difficult exam.” Recognized as the hardest bar exam in the country, the State Bar of California reported a 61.7% overall pass rate for all applicants for the 2008 July Bar exam.
http://snk.aes-int.cn/foot/403966
Sorry, I messed up the previous post in the beginning...
Here it is corrected...
...given the defendents time to prove why the captain does not have Standing in the MTD, which he stated in court, in front of witnesses, but not in court documents, that the MTD was not likely to be upheld...
Here is a Transcript of last weeks hearing. Judge Carter said no such thing.
Yes, he did:
Jeff Schwilk, founder, San Diego Minutemen, attended the Sept. 8 hearing and reported back, “Judge David Carter refused to hear Obama’s request for dismissal today, instead setting a hearing date for Oct. 5. He indicated there was almost no chance that this case would be dismissed. Assuming Judge Carter denies Obama’s motion for dismissal, he will likely then order expedited discovery which will force Obama to release his birth certificate in a timely manner.
Here is a link:
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2009/090909/FrntPgObamaEligibility.html
This one, and about 40 other published reports, by different people who were in the court, say he did say so, and like I said before, you and I had this discussion before and I proved it then.
This and about 40 other published reports by different people who were in the court say he did say so, and like I said before, you and I had this discussion before and I proved it then. So it is your contention that the court reporter, who's job it is to transcribe every word said in court, deliberately excluded that statement from the official transcript? That's your proof? Or could it be that Orly heard what she wanted to hear? That seems to be very common with her.
My statement that they did not file this year is Correct...
But is relevant how?
They can be redone if standing is established.
And how does someone who does not have standing in 2008 suddenly, magically achieve legal standing in 2009?
If you want the truth, I question why you malign someone who is going after it????
Because she's doing it in a completely inept, and comical, manner.
Yes, I am aware that they filed, you are aware of Orly Taits response as well?
I've seen no evidence that she filed one. Kreep filed his this morning. Orly blogged about it.
"So, they can ask to behead me, too and I am sure Obama and his sidekick Eric Holder will love it, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that judge Carter is going to say: Yes guys, go for it."
I can pretty much guarantee that Judge Carter isn't going to agree to have her beheaded, certainly not this early in the process. But theatrics aside, isn't it common to file a response to your opposition's motions? Should we take this reaction to mean that Orly isn't going to file any response to the motion to dismiss? It's due next Monday.
I am quite sure that this news is well known to her. Can you prove that it is not known to her?
Did you read it? That is Gary Kreep's response to the motion, not Orly's. These two are not working as a team. They are two attorneys representing different clients. Taitz made that clear in court last Tuesday - she cannot and will not work with Kreep under any circumstances. So Orly's on her own with the response. Why isn't she submitting one?