Replies

Hi N-S, good to square off with you once again LOL

Berg and Donfrio had their cases set aside because of lack of standing, neither have filed in federal court this year.

As for clients with standing, the court is hearing the case because of the preponderance of evidence of the captain, he has, however, given the defendents time to prove why the captain does not have Standing in the MTD, which he stated in court, in front of witnesses, but not in court documents, that the MTD was not likely to be upheld.
You and I already had that discussion...

As for discovery, note the [u][b]link[/u][/b] I supplied

Why? by the way are you only taking snippets of what I said, not words before the statement, and words after the statement? It makes it appear that I am saying something different from what I actually said. That is an old trick my friend, and it won’t work with me.

Orly clearly shows in court documents that the court encourages early discovery on both sides, and that cooperation is encouraged as well. Mandatory discovery can happen if one side refuses to cooperate however. This is normal procedure, talk to any lawyer on this point. I have.

Her acedemic credentials are impressive.
She completed a dentistry degree at Hebrew University
=
She later received her law degree from Taft Law School in Santa Ana, California, and subsequently passed the California bar exam., argueably the toughest of bar exams.
=
She holds a second degree black belt in Taekwondo, and speaks five languages: English, Hebrew, Romanian, Russian, and Spanish.
=
by anyones expectations, a remarkable woman.
Add to that, a mother of three sons, a full time job in itself. She is married to the father of those sons, no divorce, which is again, an accomplishment in itself.
She supports Israels right to exist, which I also personally support.

Good talking to you N-S, keep up the good work.

Berg and Donfrio had their cases set aside because of lack of standing, neither have filed in federal court this year.

But they did file. And their cases were brought to a conclusion. To date all that Orly has managed to do is file, spend 9 months serving the defense, and make it through two hearings. She has not made it past the motion to dismiss as yet. If she does that then you can crow about her. Until then she's just in the prelims, and not doing a bang up job so far.

As for clients with standing, the court is hearing the case because of the preponderance of evidence of the captain...

No evidence one way or the other has been heard, so saying that the 'preponderance of evidence' supports Captain Rhodes is a bit premature.

...given the defendents time to prove why the captain does not have Standing in the MTD, which he stated in court, in front of witnesses, but not in court documents, that the MTD was not likely to be upheld...

Here is a Transcript of last weeks hearing. Judge Carter said no such thing.

rly clearly shows in court documents that the court encourages early discovery on both sides, and that cooperation is encouraged as well. Mandatory discovery can happen if one side refuses to cooperate however. This is normal procedure, talk to any lawyer on this point. I have.

You are aware, are you not, that the defense submitted a motion to curtail discovery last Thursday? And that they are under no obligation to cooperate with Tatitz until the judge rules on their motion? Gary Kreep filed his response to that motion this morning. I doubt that Orly is aware that the motion was even filed.

She later received her law degree from Taft Law School in Santa Ana, California, and subsequently passed the California bar exam., argueably the toughest of bar exams.

There are those who say that the reason why California's failure rate is so high is because they allow graduates of law schools like Taft to sit for it.

Good talking to you N-S, keep up the good work. ,P> Same to you.