Replies

You really need to do some research and stop making up facts.

I will if you will.

Here's a few examples of what was done in Cal.

I've read the California election laws. Can you point to the one that details just what the Secretary of State is supposed to do to check candidates qualifications? Because when you look at Section 6901 it doesn't sound like they're supposed to do anything:

" Whenever a political party, in accordance with Section 7100, 7300, 7578, or 7843, submits to the Secretary of State its certified list of nominees for electors of President and Vice President of the United States, the Secretary of State shall notify each candidate for elector of his or her nomination by the party. The Secretary of State shall cause the names of the candidates for President and Vice President of the several political parties to be placed upon the ballot for the ensuing general election."

California Elections Code

But hey, maybe I'm making that up too. I'm sure you can set us straight and quote from the applicable section.

Obama, meanwhile, has refused to document his U.S. citizenship and, therefore, his eligibility to be president under the Constitution's requirement for a "natural born" citizen, his challengers say.

His supporters say he has. His detractors say he has not. What proves one side right and the other wrong? Can you identify the process?

It is my observation coupled with what you said on this thread that you are now juts having fun.

Very much so. Watching people post nonsense with such seriousness is most amusing.

On this issue you are just flat out wrong, as the examples indicate.

And as I said, if I am "flat out wrong" then you will have no problem pointing to the California law that shows it. Surely you can do that, can't you?

Class is over again.

Comedy Central, you mean.

The examples of what was done and unchallenged indicate the power the Sec of state has. What more do you need? You will not find a statute that says "check the birth certificate." However, they need to do so if they are to enforce the cionstitutional requirement. How would they check age? Also, the BC is the best evidence of "natural born." Same thing.

You said they don't have the power, but they exercised it in those situations and IIRC correctly numerous in-state situations. The absence of court challenges or legislation to change their responsibility indicates that they have the power.

Also you have failed to connect the dots with their oath of office and the constitutional requirements. Your refusal to do so is not my problem. The examples merely support what I have indicated to you a dozen times.

I promised myself I would indicate your major error and leave, but now I have picked up the tar baby and it's all over my clothes. Didn't mean to interrupt your fun. Carry on. But I have again done what needs to be done. Now that you know the facts, I'm sure you will repeat the lie on other threads. The fact that you don't accept a simple answer is your problem.