The law says, in the Constitution, the candidate must meet 3 basic requirements. There is no higher law. And many, if not all states, repeat in their laws that the candidate must meet the Constitutional requirements to appear on the ballot. In fact, they have kicked people off ballots before, including in the 2008 election cycle for not meeting the requirements.
I am advocating passing laws requiring more than Nancy Pelosi’s signature to claim elegibility, though we aren’t even sure the version of the Nominee Declaration sent to the states did even that.
But unlike chinslurps, some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time. We can be for laws forcing SOS’s to actually do the job they are ALREADY empowered to do, but we are also in full support of exposing the marxist quisling beforehand.
You, OTOH, are an Obama chinslurp.
And quote a single state's law that mandates the Secretary of State will check documents themselves? You can't, there are none. Every single state accepts the candidates from the two major parties unquestioned. And of the challenges you mentioned were made on minor party candidates which are held to a different standard.
I am advocating passing laws requiring more than Nancy Pelosi’s signature to claim elegibility, though we aren’t even sure the version of the Nominee Declaration sent to the states did even that.
Sure you are.
You, OTOH, are an Obama chinslurp.
As inaccurate claim, as your stuff usually is.
NS is a typical disguting leftist, with the whine of ‘no controlling legal authority’. Immoral people use the arguments of the NS types. It is to be ignored that Barry posted fraudulent documents trying to pose as eligible. It is to be ignored that NS’s messiah has used fraud to promote himself. We are to look past those realities and address the goreish ‘no controlling legal authority’ matra. Isn’t it time to ignore the pondscum the moderators refuse to deal with? Isn’t it becoming obvious that NS is a protected species at FR?