To: SvenMagnussen
Maj. Rebecca Ausprung, with the Department of the Army, Litigation Division in Washington, told Land this case was about Rhodes, not Obama. Completely wrong major.
The case is to determine if Obama can legitimately hold presidential office under the US Constitution Natural Born Citizen clause. If Obama is not a legitimate US President, than he cannot be the Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, and therefore cannot lawfully give orders for the military to follow.
To: Red Steel
Completely wrong major. We'll see about that.
“This is not a forum to lay ground work for a press conference,” Land said. “This is a court of law.”
Does not sound like Judge Land is quite taken with Orly's legal wizardry.
To: Red Steel
And if Rhodes is wrong, Rhodes is in very big trouble.
40 posted on
09/14/2009 2:10:44 PM PDT by
ctdonath2
(Joe Wilson was right.)
To: Red Steel; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; ...
The case is to determine if Obama can legitimately hold presidential office under the US Constitution Natural Born Citizen clause. If Obama is not a legitimate US President, than he cannot be the Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, and therefore cannot lawfully give orders for the military to follow. 
62 posted on
09/14/2009 2:30:13 PM PDT by
LucyT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson