Continue to spin your wheels on this matter, that can't prove anything if it's genuine, and can't prove anything if it's fake. The Obama campaign carefully kept it at arms' length, if you bothered to notice.
I'll continue to pursue the Constitutional angle, as far as Obama's eligibility for office. It's the only angle that matters.
For the benefit of unfamiliar FReepers and lurkers, posting history is available by clicking on the screen name, then clicking on "In Forum." You'll see no basis for MHGinTN's peculiar attack upon me. You will, however, see plenty of reason to suspect the "authority" that caught so many FReepers up in trying to "prove" the forgery of a JPEG that has no probative value.
placemark.
Nice try to spin away the reality. That ‘no value’ imagery fo forged documents was cited by a judge in order to deny a suit to cause your messiah to bring forth actual evidence that he is Constitutionally eligible. So, at least one idiot judge disagrees and places high value on the obvious forgeries you’re seeking to draw attention away from by slugsliming Polarik’s character rather than addressing the nature of the forgeries.