Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

I’m SUGGESTING the Nordyke announcement was already included in the lay-out of the paper ready to be printed.

The obama announcement was substituted in the same space. THE NORDYKE ANNOUNCEMENT HAS NOW DISAPPEARED. FOREVER!
________________
Right and I’m saying don’t bet the farm on it. ;) IF someone has happened to locate or locates an genuine hard copy, old Hawaiian newspaper from that date, and the Nordyke’s is in the paper, Obama’s is NOT, then then someone messed with the microfiche with a deliberate intent to create fraud. Unless factcheck never got it from microfiche and they just made it up as a fake. But I think someone else saw the microfilm.


9,312 posted on 08/14/2009 6:58:41 PM PDT by mojitojoe (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for the people to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9308 | View Replies ]


To: mojitojoe

factcheck never checked anything, they got their copy from texadarlin, it was sent to texasdarlin by someone who called herself LoriStarfelt, who wrote that she got it as a photocopy from Hawaii that she sent to texasdarlin by e-mail...and a little while later, another poster wrote to Atlas Shrugs sending them a similar photocopy that she got from the Hawaii library (she wrote) when she (infidel Granny) asked Hawaii for it, the woman at the counter said, ‘oh you can have this copy in my folder, another person asked for the same thing last week and I made a spare one...

or something like that.

It gives me a blinding headache just to think about it.

Factcheck ‘validated’ an ‘announcement’ received from an anonymous poster via e-mail...very impressive.

And if you or I could ever get close enough to the microfilm (very very doubtful) what would we find? The announcement substituted for the Nordyke announcement. Maybe factcheck knew all along it would be a waste of money sending anyone to the library because they already knew what was there...?


9,317 posted on 08/14/2009 7:11:34 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (DON'T LIE TO ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9312 | View Replies ]

To: mojitojoe

FROM JUNE 17

To: Fred Nerks; Beckwith
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/03/barack-hussein-birth-announcement-forgery-the-fraud-goes-on.html

Here’s a comment on Atlas Shrugs from Infidel Granny, reminding Pamela just where the birth announcement came from. It was a scan, e-mailed to her.

“Pamela,
Infidel Granny here. I am the woman who sent you the birth announcement from the Honolulu Advertiser in July 2008. You gave me a hat tip on July 23, 2008.
I sure hope you don’t think I had anything to do with a forgery.
The woman I spoke to at the Advertiser suggested I contact the Hawaii State Librbary for the info. That’s where I got it from just as it states in the blog on July 23. The librarian stated another woman had asked for the same thing about one week before I did.
You might still have my email and phone number. Feel free to contact me if you like.”


I’m putting this up here now because the link to Texasdarlin where Lori Starfelt explains how she came about her material (from the same source, by e-mail) has been removed.

Maybe factcheck didn’t appreciate me drawing attention to that fact they ‘validated’ an announcement that was an electronic image of a scan received by e-mail from an anonymous poster?

8,014 posted on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 3:47:12 PM by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)


9,318 posted on 08/14/2009 7:15:45 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (DON'T LIE TO ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9312 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson