The problem with the scenario of the Embassy registering the birth with Hawaiian officials is that, if the newspapers got the info for the announcement from the registration, it would not have the suspicious Obama address in Honolulu. No way would a U.S. Embassy have had that info.
They may have had that address if SADO gave them that address in order for them to send BC to said address....She and Sr didn’t have an address if they had been in Kenya since their marriage. ANd she may not have had contact with her parents for a while to want them to have the information.
She could then just go into the office and get a duplicate or request one from Kenya.
Remember she was a practiced liar.....Returned mail at the post office may have an envelop addressed to her....Wonder how long they keep them before they are destroyed?
The birth announcements appear to be non existent as well.
This is a summation of known facts and the conclusion can only be what he has stated.
http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/09/rumors-lies-and-unsubstantiated-facts/
Way too much credibility is given to that announcement. Has anyone ever found an actual old Hawaiian paper showing the announcement? No, I didn’t think so. Microfiche could be changed. This is the main talking point that all moonbats use to justify their case that he was born in Hawaii.
The bigger question is why wasn’t the announcement for the Klondyke twins, who were born on the same day, in the paper? Could it be one was removed and the other replaced?
Now wouldn’t it be very interesting is someone had managed to obtain a Hawaiian newspaper from that date and Obama’s was missing and the Klondyke’s was there, proving the microfiche was deliberately faked. ;)