James, youre speculating, just as we all are.
If the fact that Chief Justice John Roberts administered the oath of office to Zero is all the proof you need that hes eligible to hold the office of President, then so be it.
Its not nearly enough proof for millions of your fellow Americans.
You guys on the anti-birther side are going to have to realize at some point that you havent convinced the rest of us with your legal arguments.
Nothing except the release of Obamas personal documents and records will end this.
If you want to argue against Obama coming clean with the American public, then make that argument. Youll be forever cast as a left-wing tool if you do, but thats your last option.
We wont believe this man is eligible until he provides us with solid proof of that eligibility.
If you really want to help, join us in demanding that he release his documents.
Obama’s opposition has every right to organize to defeat him for reelection on the basis of his failure to satisfy their demands for full disclosure.
The only constitutional requirements for eligibility to be president are birth within the United States, being age 35 or above and having 14 years residence in the United States. PERIOD.
“The only constitutional requirements for eligibility to be president are birth within the United States, being age 35 or above and having 14 years residence in the United States. PERIOD”
And with that statement James has repealed Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.
You know perfectly well that is *NOT* what the Constitution says. You may be of the opinion that it's what it means, but that's what it is, your opinion.