I don’t follow what you are trying to say here. The freeper presented a document with an impossible date stamp. The Freeper swore it was a genuine article. With the date stamp that was shown, the Freeper continued to maintain the document was received some seven years before the date stamp. The debate raged. How could Hawaii have made such a mistake?
Turns out Hawaii hadn’t made a mistake. The document was received IIRC, seven years AFTER said Freeper maintained it was...
So, how would you have called it?
Freeper apologized. Should have been the end of story.
So, how would you have called it?
Freeper apologized. Should have been the end of story.
***Apparently I have missed the part where Danae apologized, because she was still saying nasty stuff about Polarik at post 604 in this thread.
The thing I’m bookmarking is what I thought would be valuable when the whole thing with Danae broke out in the first place. She apparently has a valid CoLB from Hawaii and it looked like the borders matched. Polarik can’t be faulted for being suspicious and thinking it was a fake. He even did the right thing by pinging the list ahead of time. But his detail analysis is wrong if Danae has a valid CoLB. And it’s his detail analysis that we have relied upon. As I said, it’s a strong data point.