"But people here refuse to accept the U.S. statute that defines who is a citizen at birth (in other words, a NBC)." You are now asserting that all citizens at birth are natural born citizens. That is not proven but you spittle it like it's settled law.
"I was hoping the KBC was real. Alas, it was not." And you assert that like the original paper Orly has has been exposed as a forgery. It has not, yet you assert that like it is settled. I'd say you're working for the Axelgreasy side, pretending to be a neutral Freeper ... and ridiculing freepers all along the way, you are.
“But people here refuse to accept the U.S. statute that defines who is a citizen at birth (in other words, a NBC).” You are now asserting that all citizens at birth are natural born citizens. That is not proven but you spittle it like it’s settled law.”
When you find it in the U.S. Code, yes, that is considered settled law if there are no pending cases challenging its constitutionality. Indeed, the present law (until the Supreme Court rules otherwise) is that an anchor baby is a NBC.
The 14th Amendment is the law, too, and we are not free to say either of them is not the law without looking like idiots.
“I was hoping the KBC was real. Alas, it was not.” And you assert that like the original paper Orly has has been exposed as a forgery. It has not, yet you assert that like it is settled. I’d say you’re working for the Axelgreasy side, pretending to be a neutral Freeper ... and ridiculing freepers all along the way, you are.”
Orly’s pleading makes it very clear that she did not have a paper document — EVER. She was asking the court to help her locate and then authenticate the document. You haven’t read her pleadings, but I have.