And a Justice of the Supreme Court disagreed with you long ago, citing int he Venus case ... ya know what, you’re too out there to discuss this with. I posted Justice Marshall’s quote to you and you continue to spittle with your ‘superior intellect’. You’re a creep, an arrogant lickspittlist.
That was the dissent. It thus does not constitute a holding of the Supreme Court. And there is sufficient ambiguity in his words, anyway. Regarding my comment earlier on Law of Nations, I was referring to the term as it appeared in the Constitution. There, it was not referring to the book, but in the Venus case I take your word for it. But again, the dissent is not binding on us. You are free to use it as an argument, but it is not the case that I must accept it. On the other hand, what the Supreme Court has ruled in various other citizenship cases, both you and I are required to accept as binding law.
TE calls anyone who thinks B0 wasn’t born in the US - or even might not be born in the US - “birthers”.
Anyone who uses that term perjoratively is helping Axelrod et al.