[faucetman]

Article II, setion 1, clause 5, says what it says. A term used nowhere else, for no other purpose. Yet you just want to dismiss it like it doesn’t exist or is just the same as sometho=ing else. NO IT ISN’T> It is SPECIFIC to the president, and OBAMA can’t qualify. END of STORY.

[jamese777]

Article II, setion 1, clause 5, says what it says. A term used nowhere else, for no other purpose. Yet you just want to dismiss it like it doesn’t exist or is just the same as sometho=ing else. NO IT ISN’T> It is SPECIFIC to the president, and OBAMA can’t qualify. END of STORY.

---

I don’t want to dismiss it. I would LOVE it if the Supreme Court would accept a case challenging Obama as not natural born but thus far they’ve had three or four cases to review and they’ve turned them all down.

If Obama “can’t qualify” why did the Chief Justice swear him in? Vice President Cheney declared Obama qualified at the Joint Session of Congress held on January 8th which counted and certified the Electoral College vote and the Chief Justice then swore him in on Inauguration Day.
Obviously NOT the end of the story.