Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: 1-Eagle
7,928 posted on Friday, August 07, 2009 18:28:36 by 1-Eagle
 
said: 
 
To: Lancelot Jones
Can you please state which section of the law specifically states that the father must be a citizen in order to be a "natural born citizen"?

Also, if that is the case, then why all this effort about the BC? If he is disqualified on this simple basis, then what happens next?

An article was written no long ago referencing "Obama losing control of the military" because of this mess. One way or another thus must be resolved now.

--------------------

HERE IS YOUR ANSWER.

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=001/llsl001.db&recNum=227

 

 

Page 104 of 755,






8,066 posted on 08/07/2009 9:53:13 PM PDT by Corazon (Obama the usurper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7928 | View Replies ]


To: Corazon

Um, that version was replaced in 1795. But nice try, obamanoid.


8,079 posted on 08/07/2009 10:09:57 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8066 | View Replies ]

To: Corazon
Psssst *little fun widya on the 'obamanoid' thing*

Seriously, the term natural born citizen was specifically removed for the 1795 version.

8,080 posted on 08/07/2009 10:12:10 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8066 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson