Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE
I see ... I thought it was in Carter’s court .. but it’s not.

It is in Carter's court-- see the initials "DOC" in the docket number? (For David O. Carter.)This ruling, because it was on a discovery motion, was not by Carter but by the Magistrate Judge assigned to tassist carter with the case.

7,831 posted on 08/07/2009 9:57:50 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7750 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

Thank you.

Where is that connection to Judge Carter shown ?
He has another judge assisting him on this case ?


7,837 posted on 08/07/2009 10:38:33 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7831 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson