[David]

Indeed, perhaps Stanley Ann and Barack had a Kenyan marriage cert and that is the missing page form the court filings on divorce. If they were married in Kenya, would that establish dual cit for Stanley Ann? How would that effect birth of the baby in Kenya, or in Hawaii, or in Canada? Would the grandmother have wanted the child to have AMerican citizenship so she registered him as HAwaiian born or born to an Hawaiian resident? I would still like to see legal documents that show when Barry Soetoro had a court change his name to Barack Hussein Obama. I believe he's an illegal alien, legally/illegally.

I do not know what the citizenship implications of a marriage in Kenya would be to Stanley Ann. Or how that might have resulted in deficiencies in the Hawaii birth record.

The marriage in Kenya thesis explains a number of the gaps in the record and makes obvious sense because of the bigamy implications. Of course the possibility exists that the marriage actually happened in Hawaii and they have scrubbed the record but I do not now see why they would have done that. I think the most obvious explanation for the absence of a marriage record in Hawaii is because it didn't happen there.

I believe that it did not occur to the investigators who went over there looking for evidence in early 2008 marriage documents in Kenya would be relevant so they didn't look for them.

The significance of the marriage is that there is a citizenship statute of questionable validity that would improve his citizenship at birth argument if they weren't married. I think that the record in the divorce proceeding alone is sufficient to make them married for purposes of the citizenship statute and so I have quit thinking about the marriage as a substantive issue.

Significance of the marriage in Kenya is that it contributes to the timeline and puts her in Kenya in 1961 with no record of her having returned and no record of her having been anywhere else between February 1961 and August 1961.

I have generally ignored the implications of his citizenship adventure in Indonesia and the name issue and the foreign student issue at Occidental. In theory, those things make a legal difference. In the real world, if Obama proves he was born anywhere in the US, even Hawaii, he probably wins.

[MHGinTN]

Come on, David, he's already won on the strength of his lies since the pirate Roberts swore him in without proof of eligibility, TWICE! By his own words, he doesn't fit what the founders meant witht he eligibility requirements for president. The subpreme court entertained him in chambers despite there being cases pending decision to be placed on the docket. The fix was signaled for all to see, like an 'in your face, stupid American subjects.'

The judiciary is avoiding anything which might have a contrary story surface, so the extortion factor has worked as planned.

This lying anti-American affirmative action bastard has already won, and now he and his democrat criminal enterprise party are sweepng away the remnants of the Old Republic, right before our eyes.