Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

I know that. But if the registry numbers match real South Australian registry books, then the Taitz document, with the same book number but different page number, can’t be genuine Kenyan?? Or do you have another explanation?


7,417 posted on 08/06/2009 11:20:42 AM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7413 | View Replies ]


To: Houghton M.

The Bomford doc doesn’t match anything real in Australia.

Its just a hoax.


7,430 posted on 08/06/2009 11:47:03 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7417 | View Replies ]

To: Houghton M.
But if the registry numbers match real South Australian registry books, then the Taitz document, with the same book number but different page number, can’t be genuine Kenyan?? Or do you have another explanation?

A registry book number (i.e. 44B) might exist in multiple, or every, British colonial registry. Each of those could have identical page numbers.

What would set them apart is the location of the registry office, and the contents of that particular page at the different offices.

"44B" obviously refers to a registry or "Birth" documents. It is highly likely that births were occurring and being registered at a variety of British colonies (possibly at every single colony).

7,451 posted on 08/06/2009 12:12:32 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7417 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson