Since it was editor-surveyor who called David a liar, I think I'll just pop up some popcorn and quietly observe just how deep he wants to dig that particular hole...
(For the record, I think David is legally, Constitutionally and morally correct).
If it’s not too much trouble, could one of you (or both if so inclined) tell what he is saying that are lies? I’m not asking in a challenging way but just trying to learn.
I’ve read as much of all these threads as I can and am trying to get a grasp...
Was reading obsessively until a couple of months ago, now back.
What he’s saying sounds sensible to me but if you both think there’s untruth, I’d like to know more.
Since it was editor-surveyor who called David a liar, I think I'll just pop up some popcorn and quietly observe just how deep he wants to dig that particular hole...
(For the record, I think David is legally, Constitutionally and morally correct).
He makes the following statement that is totally false:
"If Obama was born in Hawaii (or anywhere else in the 50 states), he is natural born and eligible."Obama is inelligible to be president because he is forever precluded from being a 'Natural Born' citizen under the constitution due to his father's British citizenship. It is the very exact situation that the framers sought to prevent. Go to Post 5343 for an excellant discussion of 'Natural Born's' meaning. Obama's behavior in office has proven the framers correct.