Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
"Consider, perhaps, that ‘a subject’ can be a slave without being ‘a citizen’ "

Consider that a 'subject' cannot become a monarch, thus tha issue didn't exist in common law.

7,104 posted on 08/05/2009 9:17:37 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7063 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

Easy big fella, we’re on the same side. Our Constitution was written as a Contract between the federal government and we the sovereign citizns of this nation ... not dealing with subjects, with sovereign citizens. The democrat party sees us as subjects of the federal oligarchy, no longer the sovereign citizens. So long as an affirmative action bastard ficure is allowed to hold an office without having to prove his eligibility, the federal oligarchy is sending the signal that we are no long sovereigns and will not be allowed to take back that now obsolete status subserviant (subjects) as we are now to the federal oligarchy.


7,112 posted on 08/05/2009 9:25:55 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson