A) The reason for a birth certificate being necessary is because she would have to show proof she was his MOTHER and that Obama was recognized as his FATHER. I had to submit birth certificates for my children in my divorce or I could get a divorce decree made out to whatever. Not to mention he was named after his father, if his father chose to take him back to Kenya, who would stop him without a custody order (given in the divorce). It’s silly to think there is no reason to need a birth certificate in a divorce before there was a thing called “no fault divorce”. How was she to know he wouldn’t answer the summons for the divorce? And who would be stupid enough to take that chance?
B) Airplanes to Africa were for the very very wealthy. Ship passage seemed to be a more common way to go back then. If she got stranded out there in labor, wouldn’t it make sense she would be near a PORT? Mombasa is THE port for Kenya.
C)Mombasa was not a ‘part’ of Zanzibar. Zanzibar held the deed on the land, but it had been leased FOR the state of Kenya for 75 years. If you rent an apartment, are you not able to use that as your address? Of course you are, same as Kenya used Mombasa as THEIR domain because it was PAID to be their domain.
So it’s not quite so cut and dry, is it?
I think it more likely that O's birth records would have been ordered by Dunham to get welfare or benefits.
Bottom line, if the doc's are real they would hve been requested by family, held by family and offered up by family.
Where is the chain of custody for the birth docs if they are real? It would be a very short chain. One link.
No responsible lawyer or journalist would present them, much less enter them as court evidence without at least a minimum discussion of where 45 year old docs came from.
Wouldn’t it have been easier to simply tell him to go back and read the previous 6.000+ posts since everyone of his “issues” has been discussed/debunked ad nauseum?